Administration> Social Sciences (Historical)
philosophy
Kairos :
There is a famous controversy between Kant and Hegel , Kant argued that philosophy was not a dogmatic science and all we could do was to teach philosophy , that is the reason you find the limits themselves to unknown reason .
Hegel on the other hand , for whom philosophy was a system of universal truths , argued that learning to philosophize without content was like learning to ride without stopping anywhere, whether to learn to travel was to find places to meet , also learned traveling . No one really learns anything without having thought , it happens that the teacher and the disciple first think later.
Today the position is a synthesis of the two , can not learn philosophy without the concepts that have been built throughout history. The same applies to science and culture, historic buildings that are inherited and not throw them away because they were made by other minds. But if philosophy is that we overcome the opinions evident by the practice of argumentation , we can not teach it mechanically. But this is not only for philosophy but for any learning that if we fail to compromise, if we fail to be the same student who posed the questions , all the solutions instantly forget .
Today we also know how our mind works and we need teachers to stimulate our cognitive schemas , lead to conflicts that allow us to question them and achieve reequilibrarnos and thus will have enriched our experience. We know that children do not develop alone its superior capabilities (the wolf child is not a philosopher , a scientist, or anything like it ) The problem is that teachers should officiate translators of philosophical problems and how have been raised throughout history to adapt language students to understand, but the philosophy is not merely a spontaneous occurrence
coffee or a chat .
Like a Spanish philosopher , Cifuentes says spontaneity often confused with autonomy when spontaneity generally is lack of self-criticism and reflection.
Greetings .
l0g0s :
Gentlemen I think they are not so Disagree their ideas.
On the one hand it says that you need to study philosophy and on the other the need to experience it.
Well first it is clear that learning and experience are not antagonistic terms , one can experience without learning something in a book , you can learn without experiencing it and can do both at once.
The wonder of human existence is based on the transmission of knowledge , a single human without prior knowledge could never have discovered the theory of gravity , or relativity, as much could not survive in a hostile world.
On the other hand today with the massive load of universities is being given a paradox contrary , people who get very deep universal knowledge not assimilated , stored and used only as using the bus to get to work . Being a person with great knowledge and wisdom negligible .
I have read a lot of philosophy that could literally understand but did not reach asilimar because my mind was not ready to experience a whole. Every day I read surprised me because I provide new insights into me.
http://www.nueva-acropolis.es/Filos-Humor/cuento-tao.htm
Mr. Rafael and Mr. Rahwananda both differences are not looking when in fact they may have more in common with those who think .
Salu2 !
Rafael Aparicio :
It is important to know who said what, and when ...
Indeed , men of experience know well that such a thing exists , but do not know why it exists , men of art, by contrast, know the why and wherefore . And truly affirm that project managers , whatever the job in question , they have a right to our respect than simple workers , have more knowledge and are wiser because they know the causes of what is done , while operators that resemble those inanimate beings act , but unaware of its action , like fire , for example , which burns without knowing it. In particular inanimate beings is what nature produces each of these actions , in the operators is habit. The superiority of the heads of the workers is not due to their practical ability, but the fact of having the theory and understanding the causes. Add to this that the main character of science is to be transmitted by education. And so, according to the common opinion , art, more than experience , is science , because men of art can teach, and men do not experience . ( ... )
Kairos :
Hi, Joseph commanded you some ideas to think about.
Kant was a faithful exponent of illustration , in his critique of practical reason holds the moral autonomy of the individual, looking for a moral imperative ( a law or low ) that is not conditioned by religion , society, or any purpose other than goodness is the same action. His maxims are the work so that your actions can become universal law or not take another person or yourself as a means but an end . That is, in the first case , if you do not want everyone to lie, start by not lying. Then, if I do a good deed than to receive an award . But sustaining this autonomy implied that men are free . No free men there can be no autonomy.
If you think about the salient features of the Enlightenment, and in the end that held you should have the education (learning to philosophize , to argue to discover the limits of reason, not mechanically or reproductively train children for the future and not for present) and his practical philosophy can have some home .
I hope you serve.
l0g0s :
Strong that what you said Rafael !
Almost I see racist signs ...
Poor CERN scientists spent a millionaire in an atomic accelerator and the experience is not worth a penny!
Poor laborers they do a straight wall or enfoscarla much better than the pattern and just discovered that they are nothing but a stupid mule load without any knowledge .
What makes you think that experience does not give knowledge or wisdom ?
What the hell do you think you based science ?
According to your theory man could never have evolved because of the Cro-Magnon can only know and teach you received previous studies.
I have received limited study that anyone in this forum know , so my stupid opinion is not needed in this forum . Best I leave the word to those skilled artesados like you.
